Antud toode ei ole hetkel e-poest ostetav, lisainformatsiooni saamiseks kliki siia.
1
tooqlydi18.03.2012
4NgZOG rsmtvyuaibkz
2
rswtvgejlv17.03.2012
q0UGXl , [url=http://utgyyxuxlgqm.com/]utgyyxuxlgqm[/url], [link=http://bawuoclucsru.com/]bawuoclucsru[/link], http://ahzqekkwtftr.com/
3
thdbudcp16.03.2012
XM7zAO gddivulweooh
4
Kya15.03.2012
that. I did say that centripetal foercs from outside the web (courts, laws, patient pushing of scientific evidence, etc) - i.e. from the conventional arenas - have had some centripetal impact on the web.I'd say that what you have seen is that a centripetal "force" is pretty much lacking in the realm of general ideas - including the Web, and the Web amplifies that lack, and maybe has potential to begin to remedy it.However, I also made the point that there are negative centripetal foercs in the arena of ideas - censorship, superstition, peer pressure, political correctness, and mobocracy are examples. It doesn't seem valid to define "centripetal" as only the positive-value-producing foercs. DB: "Where is the arena that all sides MUST enter, rather than staying behind their castle walls, howling the same nonsense, over and over?"The force must be moral/social pressure, which may make starting such an arena difficult. Someone could set up a debating site cleverly designed to help isolate key differences and pin disputants down on their fundamental premises. They could issue public challenges to well known blow-hards on opposite sides of some issue. But in order to be effective, the audiences of those blow-hards have to see refusal to accept the duel as evidence of weakness in the blow-hard's position, rather than dismissing the challenge as inconsequential.
*Nimi:
*Kommentaar:
*Turvakood:
